B. V. D. Zandschulp
To Win
J. Struff
To Win
Stan Wawrinka vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W L L L
Form
W W L L W L W L W LH2H: Wawrinka 1 - 0 Zandschulp
They have played 2 sets in total, with Wawrinka winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Wawrinka and Zandschulp was at the Prague II Challenger, 27-08-2020, Third, Clay with Stan Wawrinka getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stan Wawrinka | 1 |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 0 |
Prague II Challenger(27-08-2020)
6
3
6
3
| Wawrinka | Stats | Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| 31% (4-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (10-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 158 | Ranking | 88 |
| 3 | Highest Rank | 22 |
| 40 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 23 | Titles | 7 |
| 62% (691-416) | Career Total W/L | 62% (363-227) |
| $26,756,826 | Career Prize Money | $3,456,920 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Wawrinka VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Wawrinka VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:11:57 | Average Match Time | 1:11:57 |
| 58% (38/65) | 1st Serve % | 56% (38/68) |
| 68% (26/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (22/38) |
| 59% (16/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 14% (1/7) |
| 46% (31/68) | Return Points Win % | 35% (23/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stan Wawrinka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Stan Wawrinka
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Stan Wawrinka
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
68 of
115)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
115)
106
Total Points Won
110
|
1-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Stan Wawrinka
80%
(
80 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Timofey Skatov
64%
(
83 of
130)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
51 of
80)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
53 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
120)
126
Total Points Won
124
|
6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Stan Wawrinka
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Borna Coric
38%
(
24 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Borna Gojo
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Stan Wawrinka
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
15
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
36 of
44)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(6) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Arthur Cazaux
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Stan Wawrinka
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
51%
(
59 of
116)
5
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
76%
(
25 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
27 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
116)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (691/416) | Win/Loss | 62% (363/227) |
| 59% (1768/1229) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (827/591) |
| 53% (15707/14050) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7112/6286) |
| 65% (246/133) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (68/49) |
| 67% (281/141) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (170/105) |
| 55% (129/107) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (114/60) |
| 50% (35/35) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (11/13) |
| 0.46 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 6697 | Aces Total | 2883 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 2311 | Total Double Faults | 2137 |
| 1:9:44 | Average Match Time | 1:35:39 |
| 417.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 178.35 |
| 58% (44845/77597) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24045/39045) |
| 74% (33117/44845) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17182/24045) |
| 54% (17626/32790) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7226/15003) |
| 39% (2720/6909) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1778/4121) |
| 37% (29001/77858) | Return Points Win % | 41% (16358/40230) |
| 69% (163/74) | Slam W/L | 62% (32/20) |
| 57% (172/128) | Masters W/L | 50% (26/26) |
| 62% (24/15) | Cups W/L | 63% (12/7) |
| 62% (252/157) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (66/65) |
| 47% (7/8) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (71/31) | Challenger W/L | 63% (72/42) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 70% (155/67) |
| 61% (509/838) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (336/539) |
| 67% (173/257) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 53% (20/38) |
| 53% (290/549) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (100/183) |
| 58% (235/402) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (112/195) |
| 84% (640/536) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (342/303) |
| 16% (640/103) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (342/38) |
| 32% (466/150) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (246/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
